TARGET Jean-Baptiste (1733-1806) lawyer and politician. - Lot 201

Lot n° 201
Go to lot
Estimation :
200 - 300 EUR
Result without fees
Result : 135EUR
TARGET Jean-Baptiste (1733-1806) lawyer and politician. - Lot 201
TARGET Jean-Baptiste (1733-1806) lawyer and politician. L.A.S. "Target", July 28, 1769, [to Charles-Joseph NATOIRE?]; 2 pages in-4. About the lawsuit of the architect Mouton against the painter Natoire. [Charles-Joseph NATOIRE (1700-1777), director of the Académie de France in Rome, had expelled from it the architect Adrien MOUTON (1741-1820) who had refused to present the director with a confession bill for Easter; Mouton won his case in 1770, Natoire being condemned to 20,000 livres in damages and costs]. He sent a brief: "It is only a question of repairing the honor of the young man who was chased away and slandered. He asked for reparations, and damages, if we can come to an arrangement, he does not want any more money, except for his expenses; he only asks for something public, which announces the error of which he was the victim." Attached is this handwritten memorandum, December 17, 1768 (6 p. in-4), setting out the affair in detail; Natoire's duty is to watch over the morals of the students, but he is condemned not only for having exceeded his authority, and wanting to "subject the French to Roman practices. The French who live in Rome under the protection of the King, must live there according to our maxims". Attached is a L.A.S from François-Denis TRONCHET (1726-1806, lawyer, defender of Louis XVI), Paris February 10 [for March 1785, to Jean-Baptiste TARGET] (1 p. in-4, address). On the reception of Target at the Académie française (March 10, 1785).Tronchet congratulates him again, but makes an observation on the sentence of his speech about eloquence among the Athenians: "You said that eloquence which maintains the energy of the nation is preferable to public tranquility. This idea, taken as a general principle, can be considered as false, and even more as dangerous"... Then he makes another remark on the answer of Mr. de NIVERNOIS which could not please some of their fellow lawyers...
My orders
Sale information
Sales conditions
Return to catalogue